Home / dating in the 70s / Mormon carbon dating

Mormon carbon dating

by Helen Fryman Question: What about radiocarbon dating? Response: I asked several people who know about this field. (1.) C14 dating is very accurate for wood used up to about 4,000 years ago.

This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age.

Some believe trees are known to be as old as 9,000 years. A lot of people doubt this claim for various good reasons I wont go into here.We believe all the dates over 5,000 years are really compressible into the next 2,000 years back to creation.So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).Robert Whitelaw has done a very good job illustrating this theory using about 30,000 dates published in Radio Carbon over the last 40 years.One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.If you have any more questions about it don't hesitate to write.(2.) I just listened to a series of lectures on archaeology put out by John Hopkins Univ.The lecturer talked at length about how inaccurate C14 Dating is (as 'corrected' by dendrochronology).The methodology is quite accurate, but dendrochronology supposedly shows that the C14 dates go off because of changes in the equilibrium over time, and that the older the dates the larger the error.

506 comments

  1. Feb 1, 2018. Reliable carbon dating is an essential element in the study of ancient past life, but the location, correct identification, and dating of horse and other ancient animal remains can pose significant challenges that are not always understood or appreciated. First, only a tiny fraction of the remains of past animal life.

  2. There are stylistic nuances that support and refute the historicity of the Book of Mormon, but those are found via analysis and are not direct side-by-side. There are a couple of hundred examples of such texts, the majority dating from the late seventh century, and geographically mainly from Jerusalem southward.

  3. Aug 12, 2011. Jason. August 16, 2011 at am. I'm curious to hear more about the reliability of carbon dating. A lot of Dr. Coe's assertions about the existence of certain seeds, iron, etc. are based on our understanding of carbon dating. Isn't that correct? Do Mormon apologists argue against the validity of carbon dating.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*